Performance of a Norfentanyl Immunoassay in Specimens with Low Concentrations of Fentanyl and/or Norfentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Many fentanyl immunoassays are limited in their ability to detect norfentanyl. Urine specimens collected from individuals who have been exposed to fentanyl frequently have detectable concentrations of norfentanyl (≥2 ng/mL) but low concentrations of fentanyl (<2 ng/mL) by LC-MS/MS. The Lin-Zhi Fentanyl II Immunoassay (Lin-Zhi) claims 100% cross-reactivity with norfentanyl and therefore may detect exposure missed by other assays. METHODS: In addition to verifying the manufacturer's analytical sensitivity claims, we selected 92 urine specimens with low-positive Lin-Zhi results (1-99 absorbance units, lowest 10%) for analysis by the Immunalysis Health Equity Impact Assessment and ARK II fentanyl methods. The accuracy of the 3 immunoassays was compared to LC-MS/MS as the reference method. RESULTS: Spiking studies using purified fentanyl and norfentanyl and a set of 100 consecutive specimens confirmed the manufacturer's claims of limit of detection for fentanyl (3.8 ng/mL) and norfentanyl (5.0 ng/mL). However, the 92 low-positive patient specimens demonstrated concentrations of norfentanyl and fentanyl below 2.0 ng/mL by LC-MS/MS, with 47 (51%) having only norfentanyl detected. When comparing Lin-Zhi to the Immunalysis and ARK II immunoassays, only 27 (29%) of the 92 specimens were concordant. Fifty-two (57%) of the specimens were positive by LC-MS/MS and Lin-Zhi but false negative by one or both other immunoassays. Seven specimens (8%) were positive by Lin-Zhi but negative by the other immunoassays and had undetectable concentrations (<2 ng/mL) of fentanyl and norfentanyl by LC-MS/MS. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical sensitivity of the Lin-Zhi exceeds the manufacturer's claims, providing results comparable to LC-MS/MS methods.

Evaluating Clinical Sequelae of the Carbapenem-Valproate Interaction: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background: Previous studies identified a rapid decrease in valproate serum concentrations when coadministered with a carbapenem; however, the specific consequences and subsequent therapy adjustments are not well described. We aimed to investigate the clinical and therapeutic implications of the carbapenem-valproate drug-drug interaction. Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from 2 large academic medical centers during January 2017 to June 2022. The primary outcome was incidence of seizures or behavioral events stratified by valproate indication. All adult patient encounters with concomitant administration of any carbapenem antimicrobial and valproate were included. Patients without prolonged exposure to valproate prior to hospitalization, without valproate levels pre- and post-carbapenem administration, with an admitting diagnosis of seizure, with exposure to other agents that decrease valproate concentrations, or who had a seizure during the hospitalization prior to carbapenem exposure were excluded. Results: Two hundred fifty-eight episodes of concomitant use among 78 unique adult patients were included. Valproate was used for seizure control in 41 patients (52.6%) and for mood-related disorders in 37 (47.4%). In those prescribed valproate for its antiepileptic properties, seizures occurred following carbapenem administration in 46.3% of encounters. In those taking valproate for mood-related disorders, 50.8% met the primary endpoint of behavioral disturbance. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates significant clinical implications of the carbapenem-valproate interaction. Clinicians should be aware of this interaction and consider alternative antimicrobial and/or antiepileptic agents whenever possible. Adding or increasing doses of antiepileptic agents and/or consultation with a neurologist prior to concomitant use should be considered when this combination cannot be avoided.

Analysis of a Medication Safety Intervention in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Importance: Strategies to reduce medication dosing errors are crucial for improving outcomes. The Medication Education for Dosing Safety (MEDS) intervention, consisting of a simplified handout, dosing syringe, dose demonstration and teach-back, was shown to be effective in the emergency department (ED), but optimal intervention strategies to move it into clinical practice remain to be described. Objective: To describe implementation of MEDS in routine clinical practice and associated outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This mixed-methods interrupted time series study of MEDS was conducted April 2021 to December 2022 in an academic pediatric ED using a hybrid type 1 design. Parents and guardians of children aged 90 days to 11.9 years who were discharged with acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or both were eligible for inclusion in the quantitative portion. Clinicians from a diversity of role groups (attending physician, resident, and nurse) were eligible for the qualitative portion. Exposures: The study was conducted in 5 stages (baseline, intervention 1, washout, intervention 2, and sustainability phases). The 2 intervention phases taught clinical staff the MEDS intervention using different implementation strategies. During the intervention 1 phase, in-depth interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached; results were analyzed using thematic analysis. Interviews informed intervention 2 phase interventions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was any error (defined as dosing or frequency error) at a 48- to 72-hour follow-up phone call. Results: There were 256 participants (median [IQR] child age, 1.7 [3.0-7.0] years; median [IQR] parent and guardian age, 36.0 [31.0-41.0] years; 200 females among parents and guardians [78.1%]) who consented and completed follow-up. At baseline, 44 of 68 participants (64.7%) made an error compared with 34 of 65 participants (52.3%) during intervention 1, 31 of 63 participants (49.X%) during intervention 2, and 34 of 60 participants (57.X%) during sustainability. After adjustment for language and health literacy, the adjusted odds ratio for error during the combined intervention phases was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.28-0.97) compared with baseline. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that both MEDS intervention phases were associated with decreased risk of error and that some improvement was sustained without active intervention. These findings suggest that attempts to develop simplified, brief interventions may be associated with improved medication safety for children after discharge from the ED.

The importance of time-resolved personal Dosimetry in space: The ISS Crew Active Dosimeter.

Monitoring space radiation is of vital importance for risk reduction strategies in human space exploration. Radiation protection programs on Earth and in space rely on personal and area radiation monitoring instruments. Crew worn radiation detectors are crucial for successful crew radiation protection programs since they measure what each crewmember experiences in different shielding configurations within the space habitable volume. The Space Radiation Analysis Group at NASA Johnson Space Center investigated several compact, low power, real-time instruments for personal dosimetry. Following these feasibility studies, the Crew Active Dosimeter (CAD) has been chosen as a replacement for the legacy crew passive radiation detectors. The CAD device, based on direct ion storage technology, was developed by Mirion Dosimetry Services to meet the specified NASA design requirements for the International Space Station (ISS) and Artemis programs. After a successful Technology demonstration on ISS, the CAD has been implemented for ISS Crew operations since 2020. The current paper provides an overview of the CAD development, ISS results and comparison with the ISS Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) and the Radiation Environment Monitor 2 (REM2) instruments.

Cannabis positivity rates in 17 emergency departments across the United States with varying degrees of marijuana legalization.

BACKGROUND: Many states in the United States have progressed towards legalization of marijuana including decriminalization, medicinal and/or recreational use. We studied the impact of legalization on cannabis-related emergency department visits in states with varying degrees of legalization. METHODS: Seventeen healthcare institutions in fifteen states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington) participated. Cannabinoid immunoassay results and cannabis-related International Classification of Diseases (ninth and tenth versions) codes were obtained for emergency department visits over a 3- to 8-year period during various stages of legalization: no state laws, decriminalized, medical approval before dispensaries, medical dispensaries available, recreational approval before dispensaries and recreational dispensaries available. Trends and monthly rates of cannabinoid immunoassay and cannabis-related International Classification of Diseases code positivity were determined during these legalization periods. RESULTS: For most states, there was a significant increase in both cannabinoid immunoassay and International Classification of Diseases code positivity as legalization progressed; however, positivity rates differed. The availability of dispensaries may impact positivity in states with medical and/or recreational approval. In most states with no laws, there was a significant but smaller increase in cannabinoid immunoassay positivity rates. CONCLUSIONS: States may experience an increase in cannabis-related emergency department visits with progression toward marijuana legalization. The differences between states, including those in which no impact was seen, are likely multifactorial and include cultural norms, attitudes of local law enforcement, differing patient populations, legalization in surrounding states, availability of dispensaries, various ordering protocols in the emergency department, and the prevalence of non-regulated cannabis products.

Implementation of an Electronic Alert to Improve Timeliness of Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients With Suspected Serious Infections in the Emergency Department: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Delays in the second dose of antibiotics in the emergency department (ED) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with serious infections. We analyzed the influence of clinical decision support to prevent delays in second doses of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the ED. METHODS: We allocated adult patients who received cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in 9 EDs within an integrated health care system to an electronic alert that reminded ED clinicians to reorder antibiotics at the appropriate interval vs usual care. The primary outcome was a median delay in antibiotic administration. Secondary outcomes were rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay. We included a post hoc secondary outcome of frequency of major delay (>25% of expected interval for second antibiotic dose). RESULTS: A total of 1,113 ED patients treated with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam were enrolled in the study, of whom 420 remained under ED care when their second dose was due and were included in the final analysis. The clinical decision support tool was associated with reduced antibiotic delays (median difference 35 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 65). There were no differences in ICU transfers, inpatient mortality, or hospital length of stay. The clinical decision support tool was associated with decreased probability of major delay (absolute risk reduction 13%, 95% CI, 6 to 20). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a clinical decision support alert reminding clinicians to reorder second doses of antibiotics was associated with a reduction in the length and frequency of antibiotic delays in the ED. There was no effect on the rates of ICU transfers, inpatient mortality, or hospital length of stay.

Safety and Tolerability of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline Administered Over 2 to 5 Minutes for the Treatment of Cerebral Herniation and Intracranial Pressure Elevation.

BACKGROUND: Hyperosmolar therapy is the cornerstone of medical management of sustained elevated intracranial pressure from cerebral edema. Acute intracranial hypertension and herniation is a medical emergency that requires rapid treatment and stabilization to prevent secondary brain injury or death. Intravenous hypertonic sodium chloride (NaCl) 23.4% is an effective treatment modality commonly used in this setting. Because of its high osmolarity, use has historically been limited primarily to central venous line administration as an intermittent infusion due to concerns about thrombophlebitis, injection site pain, and tissue necrosis or injury with extravasation. The objective of this analysis was to prospectively evaluate the safety of administration of 23.4% NaCl as a rapid intravenous push over 2-5 min. METHODS: A prospective analysis of patients admitted between April 2021 and December 2021 who received 23.4% NaCl intravenous push over 2-5 min in a central or peripheral line was performed. Safety end points included incidence of new onset hypotension [defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mm Hg or SBP decrease of at least 20 mm Hg], bradycardia (defined as heart rate < 50 beats per minute), and infusion site reactions documented within 1 h of administration. For secondary safety outcomes, highest and lowest SBP and lowest heart rates documented within 1 h before 23.4% NaCl administration were compared with values collected within 1 h post administration and evaluated by mixed-design analysis of variance test with adjustment for peripheral versus central line administration. RESULTS: We identified 32 patients who received 79 administrations of 23.4% NaCl through a central line or peripheral line during the study period. An SBP decrease of at least 20 mm Hg was observed in 13% of patients, an SBP < 90 mm Hg occurred in 16% of patients, and bradycardia occurred in 3% of patients who received 23.4% NaCl. Injection site pain was reported by one patient without documented thrombophlebitis, cellulitis, or tissue damage. Pain was not reported during two subsequent administrations in the same patient. There was no documented occurrence of soft tissue injury or necrosis in any patient. Compared with baseline vital signs before 23.4% NaCl administration, no difference in vital signs post administration was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Central and peripheral administration of 23.4% NaCl over 2-5 min was well tolerated, and incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, or infusion site-related adverse events was rare.

Cardiovascular Pharmacology.

Pharmacologic therapy is an integral component in the management of most cardiovascular emergencies. This article reviews the pharmacotherapy involved in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, acute heart failure, and various arrhythmias. The focus will be to provide practical pearls that can be applied at the bedside in the Emergency Department.

A retrospective review of implementation of an inhaled epoprostenol protocol in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled epoprostenol is a selective pulmonary vasodilator that has shown a potentially broad number of applications in the management of critically ill patients. To date, the vast majority of the literature with regard to efficacy, indications for use, and adverse effects of inhaled epoprostenol is focused on use of this agent in critical care settings, with relatively little literature describing use of inhaled epoprostenol in the Emergency Department. This retrospective review sought to examine instances in which inhaled epoprostenol was administered in the Emergency Department of a tertiary-care, Level I trauma center following implementation of a clinical pathway for administration of this medication for cases of refractory hypoxemia, RV dysfunction, and refractory hypoxemia. Primary outcomes were monitoring for adverse effects (i.e. hypotension), trend in FiO2 requirement over time, and clinical indication for initiation of inhaled epoprostenol. METHODS: An automated review was performed to query cases in which inhaled epoprostenol had been initiated in the Emergency Department following adoption of the inhaled epoprostenol clinical pathway. Cases were excluded if the medication was initiated in the prehospital setting, ordered but not administered, or administered for a period of <1 h. Vital signs and co-administration of vasopressors were followed before and following epoprostenol administration to assess for change over time. Clinical indication of epoprostenol administration was assessed via manual chart review. RESULTS: Inhaled epoprostenol was administered in 20 instances, with 15 cases ultimately meeting inclusion criteria. There were no cases of clinically significant hypotension (MAP <65) in any of the cases in which inhaled epoprostenol was administered in the Emergency Department, and mean vasopressor requirement did not increase over time. A majority of patients saw a reduction in FiO2 requirement following administration of inhaled epoprostenol. The most common indication for initiation of inhaled epoprostenol based on manual chart review was pulmonary embolism. DISCUSSION: In this review of cases in which inhaled epoprostenol was administered following adoption of a clinical pathway for medication administration, there were no cases of hypotension or other adverse effects that appear to be attributable to medication administration. Pulmonary embolism and refractory hypoxemia were the most common noted indications for administration of inhaled epoprostenol. Further research is warranted regarding development of clinical protocols for administration of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in the Emergency Department setting.

High risk and low prevalence diseases: Acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease.

INTRODUCTION: Acute chest syndrome (ACS) in sickle cell disease (SCD) is a serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of ACS in SCD, including diagnosis and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence. DISCUSSION: ACS is defined by respiratory symptoms and/or fever and a new radiodensity on chest imaging in a patient with SCD. There are a variety of inciting causes, including infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Although ACS is more common in those with homozygous SCD, clinicians should consider ACS in all SCD patients, as ACS is a leading cause of death in SCD. Patients typically present with or develop respiratory symptoms including fever, cough, chest pain, and shortness of breath, which can progress to respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation in 20% of adult patients. However, the initial presentation can vary. While the first line imaging modality is classically chest radiograph, lung ultrasound has demonstrated promise. Further imaging to include computed tomography may be necessary. Management focuses on analgesia, oxygen supplementation, incentive spirometry, bronchodilators, rehydration, antibiotics, consideration for transfusion, and specialist consultation. Empiric antibiotics that cover atypical pathogens are necessary along with measures to increase oxygen-carrying capacity in those with hypoxemia such as simple transfusion or exchange transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of ACS can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease.

Effects of a pharmacy-driven medication history program on patient outcomes.

PURPOSE: Obtaining an accurate medication history is a vital component of medication reconciliation upon admission to the hospital. Despite the importance of this task, medication histories are often inaccurate and/or incomplete. We evaluated the association of a pharmacy-driven medication history initiative on clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the general medicine service of an academic medical center. METHODS: Comparing patients who received a pharmacy-driven medication history to those who did not, a retrospective stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting propensity score analysis was used to estimate the average treatment effect of the intervention on general medical patients. Fifty-two patient baseline characteristics including demographic, operational, and clinical variables were controlled in the propensity score model. Hospital length of stay, 7-day and 30-day unplanned readmissions, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 11,576 eligible general medical patients, 2,234 (19.30%) received a pharmacy-driven medication history and 9,342 (80.70%) patients did not. The estimated average treatment effect of receiving a pharmacy-driven medication history was a shorter length of stay (mean, 5.88 days vs 6.53 days; P = 0.0002) and a lower in-hospital mortality rate (2.34% vs 3.72%, P = 0.001), after adjustment for differences in patient baseline characteristics. No significant difference was found for 7-day or 30-day all-cause readmission rates. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy-driven medication histories reduced length of stay and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to the general medical service at an academic medical center but did not change 7-day and 30-day all-cause readmission rates. Further research via a large, multisite randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm our findings.

Intoxication related to substances use in patients presenting to Ain Shams University Poisoning Treatment Center, Cairo, Egypt (2015-2019).

INTRODUCTION: Illicit drug use may result in several emergencies. Hospital emergency data can help to detect new patterns of substance use and high-risk trends of drug use. This epidemiological study aimed to investigate the pattern and outcome of cases with substance use intoxication who presented to Ain Shams University Poisoning Treatment Centre, Cairo, Egypt. METHODS: This retrospective study included all cases of acute intoxication due to use/misuse of substances who presented to the centre during the period (2015-2019). RESULTS: The study included 11 281 cases; young adults (aged 20-40 years) represented the greatest proportion of cases (6519, 57.8%). Males were the predominant gender in all age groups (representing 79.2% of the cases). Tramadol was the most common substance of exposure in all age groups except for children and adolescents where cannabis was the most common one. There were 162 fatalities (1.4% of all cases) and opioids had the greatest case fatality rate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Tramadol was the most used drug that resulted in acute intoxication, followed by cannabis. A total of 43.6% of the cases of acute intoxications were due to recreational use/misuse of prescription drugs.

Impact of marijuana legalization on cannabis-related visits to the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is widely used in the United States despite federal laws. In US states that have progressed toward legalization, there have been various reported impacts on cannabis-related emergency department (ED) visits. However, studies on the impact of legalization in Massachusetts (MA) EDs are lacking. METHODS: Cannabinoid immunoassay (THC IA) results and cannabis-related ICD-10 codes were obtained for consecutive patient ED visits at two academic medical centers in Boston, MA over the following legalization periods (January 2012-December 2019): decriminalized (DEC), before medical dispensaries (MED BD), medical dispensaries available (MED DISP), before recreational dispensaries (REC BD) and recreational dispensaries available (REC DISP). Trends and monthly positivity rates for THC IA and ICD-10 codes were determined for these legalization periods. RESULTS: There was an increase in both THC IA (p < .0001) and cannabis-related ICD-10 codes (p < .0001) in the ED as legalization progressed at both institutions. Positivity rates significantly increased by 7% for THC IA and 0.4% for ICD-10 codes. Increases in THC IA positivity were seen in females, patients aged 30-39, older adults (>59 years), and those in the highest income tertile. There was an increasing trend in amphetamine positivity and decreasing trend in opiate positivity in patients with positive THC IA. Unlike THC IA, significant trends per patient demographics were not seen with ICD-10 codes. CONCLUSIONS: Legalization of marijuana in MA has led to an increase in cannabis use as indicated by both increasing rates of positive THC IA results, in older adults, as well as increasing cannabis-related ICD-10 codes. Data suggest a steady increase in THC use associated with legalization that was not associated with an increase in opiate, fentanyl, or cocaine use. We recommend using ED THC IA positivity, an objective laboratory measure, to monitor THC use and the impact of state-specific progression in cannabis legalization.

Nudging Emergency Department-Initiated Addiction Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: When initiated in the Emergency Department (ED), medication for addiction treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine improves outcomes, increases engagement in addiction treatment and decreases the use of inpatient addiction treatment services. Unfortunately, initiating MAT in the ED is not yet standard practice. We assessed the impact of the addition of a multipart behavioral science-based intervention to increase opioid use disorder (OUD)-related treatments prescribed in the ED. METHODS: Our ED initiated a campaign to help ED faculty obtain their DEA-X waiver required to prescribe buprenorphine. In parallel, we implemented 2 ED-initiated buprenorphine treatment pathways. We then conducted a two-stage qualitative process informed by behavioral science to identify key barriers to physician use of the MAT protocol. Using these insights, we developed 4 behavioral science-based interventions. To assess the impact of the interventions on the number of OUD-related treatments per day among patients meeting the inclusion criteria we compared the number of OUD-related treatments per day before versus after the interventions began using t tests. Then, in our primary model, we estimated the causal effect of the behavioral interventions using a regression discontinuity in time approach. RESULTS: Across the entire year study period, there is an increase in OUD-related treatment after the interventions begin, driven by greater use of ambulatory referral orders. The unadjusted mean difference in any OUD treatments per day pre- versus post-intervention increased by 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04, 1.56; P = 0.039) whereas the number of ambulatory referral orders placed increased by 0.82 (95% CI: 0.48,1.16; P < 0.001). Using the 120-day study window and an ordinary least squares regression discontinuity in time model, the 4-part intervention increased the number of patients receiving any opioid treatment in the ED by 1.6 additional treatments per day (95% CI: 0.04, 3.19; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: To support our protocol and increase the provision of ED-MAT, we implemented 1 patient-facing and 3 provider-facing interventions rooted in behavioral science principles. Our results show that this pack of behavioral science interventions increased the likelihood that ED providers offer MAT to patients with OUD.

Use of antipsychotic and sedative medications in older patients in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics and sedatives are used to treat agitation in the emergency department (ED) but carry significant risk in older adults. Our objective was to determine factors associated with their administration to older ED patients. METHODS: This was an observational study using data from the 2014-2017 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We identified ED visits for patients aged ≥65 years and determined whether an antipsychotic or sedative was administered. Visits related to substance use/withdrawal, other psychiatric complaints, and intubation were excluded. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors for antipsychotic or sedative administration. RESULTS: Of the 78.7 million ED visits that met inclusion criteria, 3.5% involved at least one dose of antipsychotic or sedative medication; 13% involved an antipsychotic and 92% a sedative. Factors associated with antipsychotic administration included nursing home residence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.05-6.80), dementia (aOR: 5.62; 95% CI: 2.44-12.94), and delirium (aOR: 7.33; 95% CI: 2.21-24.32). Sedative administration was positively associated with CT or MR imaging (aOR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.42-2.43), urbanicity of ED (aOR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02-2.08), and female gender (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.08-1.99) and negatively associated with older age (age: 75-84; aOR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49-0.91; age: 85+; aOR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.45-0.88; reference age: 65-74 years). Antipsychotic and sedative administration were associated with prolonged ED lengths of stay and hospital admission. CONCLUSION: We identified patient- and facility-level factors associated with sedative and antipsychotic administration in older ED patients. Antipsychotic and sedative administration were associated with prolonged ED lengths of stay and hospital admission.

Continuation of outpatient buprenorphine therapy after dispensing Buprenorphine-Naloxone from the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are frequently seen in the ED for opioid-related reasons, which creates an opportunity for ED providers to discuss medications for OUD with their patients. Buprenorphine is a partial mu-opioid agonist that is FDA approved to treat OUD and may be initiated in the ED. Traditionally, buprenorphine therapy was initiated under healthcare provider observation; however, other strategies such as at-home induction have also emerged. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive analysis of patients aged 18 years or older who received a take-home supply of buprenorphine-naloxone from an urban, academic ED between March 2018 and March 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who filled a prescription for buprenorphine at three months after index ED visit. The proportion of patients that filled a prescription for buprenorphine at six months was also evaluated. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of patients with return ED visit within six months related to opioid overdose. RESULTS: There were 242 patient records reviewed with 155 patients included in final analysis. Seventy (45.2%) patients filled buprenorphine prescriptions at three months, with 64 (41.3%) who filled buprenorphine prescriptions at six months. Seventeen (11%) patients had a return ED visit related to opioid overdose within six months. CONCLUSION: Dispensing buprenorphine take-home kits from the ED resulted in continuation of outpatient buprenorphine in almost 50% of patients. Further studies are warranted to define the role of ED-dispensed buprenorphine.